The Weekly World Thingy

"YOU WON'T HEAR THAT ON TELEVISION!!" World's Second Finest News Source since 2001.

Sunday, December 16, 2007

Thanks You For Your Support

This CIA agent is telling us about the torture techniques being used and approved directly by George W Bush. George W Bush has said repeatedly that we do not torture.

He also says that we've had 6 years to develop agents in Al-Qaeda. However, the ex-Italian president says that intelligence communities know the CIA and Mossad performed 9/11. We have been infiltrating ourselves.

Because of reports like this, I believe there are two CIA's. One branch is legitimate and has the best interests of America and the world at heart, and is defending major populations and resources, while the second is sinister and trying to gain control of the world's resources away from the general populace of the world and other nations. Basically, one is obeying the Constitution, and one is failing it.

This may be the two ways humans are responding to the problem of evil. By trying to be good, and by trying to be a greater evil.

China is not an enormous threat if you don't f with them. They are a problem because we're being a problem. They are like the 2nd place racer. Yeah he'll stone you. If you fail. We're failing right now on purpose because of agents like Bush and illuminati members. China is doing their job in the natural progress towards goodness, in a way much kinder than Russia would have in the 1960's. They even have their own illuminati-fighting gang. What we should do is work with them, our opposites, to get them to run cleanly and civilly. That is being the 7 to their 5. They, being the 5 to our 7, will politely kick the nonsense out of America if America fucks up. Unfortunately, without us it'd be a big, big ugly fight for about 7 years. But they'd learn democracy and Constitutionality, just like we could have taught them. And we'd probably have intelligence by then, or needed to use all of our equality and intelligence to remain alive. Which arguably is justice. Like getting crushed is justice.

Let's do it the easy way. What way is that? Impeach this man, which is possible, but more like pulling out a fishhook. What through could we push it to? The next finger? 2008? We'll just shake that one off? Unlikely, frankly. Then it'd have to be cut and removed. It'd be ugly both ways. Ron Paul seems like the cut and remove concept. Literally. Impeachment is yanking the hook, or pulling, or easing it out. Which is better? I grant you we're poisoned now, and harming the world. Watery blood of a dead man and all. It's written. The torn scroll curling up is a mushroom cloud. Chapter 6? Read. . Math.

Remove him now, so we can cleanse this poison to the world.

We will rebuild it better. You're going to miss this infected wasteland? How to begin?

One of the key pieces is to have cia agents openly out osama bin laden as cia, and unravel the entire 9/11 story on tv. I am waiting for kieth olbermann to do that one. Or Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich himself. Maybe do a roundup to that, with a week of events cracking it wider and then wider.

Soon citizen journalism will overtake the CIA in news decisionmaking. Hi! We're digging from two ends of a tunnel. Yes, you've still got so much of the material. But don't close that hole. It is happening. You will need to give us the liberty and information to make our own decisions. We'll be the most powerful humanity on earth, fully informed. This could be revelations, the public getting a hold of most of the state secrets and then all of them. Revealed. Apocrapha. Apocalypse. What happens then?

We vote. No, it's too soon for that. We public will find out the real money chain and position on every candidate and politician coming into the city and what they want to do about the world's organization. We're not buying a 4-year car, love it or leave it. We're buying a toolkit and a model, and we the people, having this information and a growing global intelligence movement, even after the elections, coz we'll care then too, only more so, Ron Paul or no, we will be equipped with suitable knowledge to run our financial and government systems in a way people in the 1960's or the anarchists were not. We are on the verge of meshing gears with public as the government itself. Get it ready, CIA.

Saturday, December 15, 2007

I've recently held myself back from commenting scientifically and investigating the secret societies and the destruction of America by globalists for reasons I might call cowardice, and by warnings that it is freakishly dangerous. In these past days to weeks, I've seen the movement actually recede slightly. It is unpleasant. To think that thousands of people out there or more have fallen away from truth and that the message has not reached their ears turns my stomach.

And yet, it is still and increasingly dangerous to do this task. Western secret societies are poised to snap on free individuals. Chinese secret societies are poised to snap on Western secret societies. Where does the average blogger fit into this puzzle in the eyes of the terrorists?

A prison camp. Or in a state censored area. Or dead. I'd like to avoid all of those potentialities in the next decade as both secret societies either crumble or are dismantled into the general enlightened populace.

Where do we fit into it in our own eyes? As teachers to the world. As life long learners. As those hoping to build a better less corrupt tomorrow. Let's go.

You secret society folk are making a HALF ASSED WORLD. We have the other half. Let's make this dump look good.

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

State of Truth 2008

State of Truth 2008

World is changing. Man's experience will be entirely different but for what clings to intelligence.

-secret societies and their power revealed to public
-libertarian counterrevolution to globalism puts nationalism undersealevel
-fault lines exposed
-government: NWO, Libertarians, or a split. Filtering out worldwide. Fx elections and educate populations.
-Analyze NWO society for ethical weaknesses, intelligence, composition and internal inequalities.

-Major industrial production and movers associated with NWO
-New technology and organization stifled
-Research impaired and censored that threatens industrial hegemony

-Major finance houses major players in NWO and government influence.
-Certain governments are acting agents to NWO plans with their militaries, industrial bases, and financial resources.
-Identify and replace or remove these chairs
-Numerous global economic crisies looming. Major threat to world's populations.
-Identify, analyze, and prepare with stockpiles, elections, education, and small socialism.

Saturday, December 01, 2007

Youtube Debates

CNN has performed poorly during this debate. Many questions were engineered and falsely selected, not unlike the planting of questions by FEMA and Hillary Clinton. CNN is not a trustworthy news source.

New Media is.

Youtube was unfortunately manhandled into being used for these debates. The questions raised at the debates are not representative of the population of videos on youtube. Youtube is a corporate site, but it is a good [but monitored] place to post videos about anything, any true data.

The very long amount of airtime devoted to the homosexual was inappropriate. That question is not interesting to voters and is a diversionary tactic played by the media. The other questions were similar. The debate did not show Ron Paul's strength. He was blackballed by our media, just as before. Just as foretold would be done before he became this well known. The media will never, not even in late 2008, play fairly to Ron Paul.

By then we New Media should have a stronger media footprint. More people will have switched away from television and to internet news, where they will get a better spectrum of news sources and be exposed to true data.

To accurately represent Ron Paul's positions we should spend time airing more informational videos about high finance groups and abuses of state and present Ron Paul as an excellent stepping stone to the solution. We can produce the dream of what a world cast after Ron Paul's policies would look like. How much money would we save from ending the drug war and coming home from Iraq? And from that strong standpoint, what would we do differently than the neocons about peak oil and both fake and real terrorism?

What can Ron Paul do to spend the scores of millions of dollars he continues to amass and get his message into the public? As supporters of Ron Paul we can continue to put up signs and organize at rallies and media events in support of him. The blimp is nifty, but it's not tip-top. What is tip-top?

1. I want to see a 30-minute video showing us Ron Paul on the campaign trail. We could make it a segment like Real World, but with Ron Paul where he talks about his policies and some history and successes and lots of neat information buds for viewers to research more about. This could be put on a DVD and mailed to households with a colorful pamphlet and a sticker or button. That would be good, and could easily reach a million republican voters in key states. It would seed the public with lots of great information. It should also be broadcast on television. Perhaps on C-SPAN or a friendly non-corporate TV station, and advertised for once or twice. And it could be on

2. I would still love to see a day devoted to putting up Ron Paul signs on overpasses, even though certain states have made it illegal, in violation of the 1st amendment. Let's do that V-style.

3. Billboards are good. Could we get one in Times Square for a month?

4. An entire concert. We could have a few dozen bands come together to do a Ron Paul music festival tour. I WOULD GO TO THE CONCERT. We can get youth movements together, it would be so fantastic. How many musical artists can we organize to support Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich and do a charity tour around the country. Ticket proceeds would go to the campaign or to cost. They could *rock*. Let's start organizing this right now.

5. We could have a few books published or commissioned by Ron Paul's press. It might be a great opportunity to produce some serious literature in greater depth about Ron Paul's positions.

I know Ron Paul is very libertarian and prefers to not tell people what to do and equally much not be told what to do or leaned upon. This is an admirable trait, and I'd like to see this kind of personality modeled for Americans of the future.