Freedom of Security

This entry is split between media and tact because of its legal, speech, and tactical components.

There seems to be a cross between government transparency, freedom of speech, government secrecy, and finding moles or people who talk to others.

The government should ACTIVELY STRIVE to have less secrecy within its borders and internationally.

Freedom of speech is more important than security.

Breach of contract, sedition, exposing soldiers or civilians to imminent threat by speech [which partially define issues of national security], are either punishable or jailable offenses of speech.

Finding moles or unreliable legal secret keepers is low on the order of priority.

Also, the Supreme Court or a judicial branch entity should review all American secrecy cases to determine if they are credible. They should also have freedom of review to examine and search for undisclosed secrecy cases, and ability and encouragement to disclose these secrets to whomever they see fit in order to propagate their remedy.